Conflict Shapes & it Shapes Us

make war not peace.jpg
Photo by fotologic

Conflict is a normal part of human life, and while people sometimes reflect upon it as a negative state of affairs, it can be a source of creativity and innovation. As theorists, researchers, and others categorize, label, and dispute the causes and sources of conflict, it persists and continues to shape people including those that study and write about it.

This photo isn’t of me, but it could be. I have red hair and wrote about war and peace, among other things, while I studied Conflict Analysis & Resolution at George Mason University. In three words, I walked away embracing the idea that perception is reality. Thank you Dr. Sandole!

I understand that this string of words pushes truth off to the side. Many people assert that they know it, but I’m quite certain that other people hold truths that conflict with your own.

If you don’t embrace my perception is reality premise, that’s okay. My truth allows me to accept yours even if I disagree with it. It is not my place to change your mind to satisfy my own.

My original perception was that studying conflict would allow me to resolve it. But human behavior is impossible to fully quantify and predict, and points of view are continually changing. Conflict is life, and life is conflict. Resolution is change, and change is constant.

I have pushed my original perception aside, and believe (for some time now) that it is the quality of difference that humans have most in common; drawing upon this trait should be the core of change-making efforts of various types (e.g. improving interpersonal relationships, developing public policy, negotiating an agreement). Change is constant, and with it comes conflict. It shapes us as we shape it.

We all have agendas, so let me more clearly express mine. I believe that an attitude of openness towards difference is the only path to making the world a more humane place to live.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. | Share/Save | Bookmark the permalink |

4 Comments

  1. Posted July 25, 2008 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    I practice Vipassana as Lord Buddha taught (www.dhamma.org). The base of that practice is openness to difference in your words or being aware of all the changes occur in and out of our entity and being equanimous to everything positive and negative. I think the similar state of mind recommended by Jesus when he said “Don’t judge”… not only judging human, but everything. A part of a whole network can’t be judged by a single view point…. What we can do is being aware and equnimous to the changes… being open to difference.

  2. Posted July 30, 2008 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Hello Atula,

    I believe there are different philosophies that embrace or can help explain my understanding of an openness towards difference. Thanks for checking out my website.

  3. Posted July 31, 2008 at 3:22 am | Permalink

    Thanks Jason…
    I would like to tell that Vipassana is not a phylosophy but a technique we practise minimum for ten days and for about 6 days we practice (in your words) open to difference. We improve our awareness of the sensations of the body which bring signals of differences around and practice equanimity without reacting.
    Your definition is very beautiful and 100% in line with what we try to achieve…
    Atula

  4. Posted August 1, 2008 at 8:39 am | Permalink

    Atula,

    Thank you for the clarification. I very much appreciate that you like my definition of openness to difference.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Subscribe without commenting

  • Subscribe to Open to Difference
    RSS Posts | RSS Comments
    Free Email Updates

    Connect with Jason on Facebook
    Follow Jason on
    Twitter

    The intellectual who speaks on behalf of
    other runs the risk of perpetuating the
    domination that prevents these others
    from speaking for themselves.
    -Chris Falzon